In context with the writ jurisdiction of Supreme Court and High Courts, which of the following is a correct statement?

Deepika • 5.41K Points
Tutor III Politics

525

Q. In context with the writ jurisdiction of Supreme Court and High Courts, which of the following is a correct statement?

(A) Supreme Court’s writ jurisdiction is broader than the High Court.

(B) Supreme Court’s writ jurisdiction is narrower than the High Court.

(D) Supreme Court can issue writs on only Fundamental Rights, while High Courts can issue writs on only ordinary legal rights

Correct Answer - Option(B)

Explanation:

The Supreme Court can issue writs only for the enforcement of fundamental rights whereas a high court can issue writs not only for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights but also for the enforcement of an ordinary legal right. Thus, the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is narrower than that of the high court.

You must be Logged in to update hint/solution

Previous MCQ Next MCQ

Discusssion

Related MCQs on Politics

Q. An aggrieved public servant of the Union can challenge the decisions of the Administrative Tribunal:

Q. Who is the leader of the Legislative branch?

Q. Which one of the following Fundamental Rights is available to Indian citizens only ?

Q. Who is the longest serving Chief Minister in India?

Q. The power of judicial review ensures:

Q. Which one of the following rights is vital for the successful working of democracy?

Q. The budget in normal circumstances, is presented to the Parliament on :

Q. The vesting of 'residuary' powers in the central government by the Constitution of India indicates ...

Q. All legislative subject are mentioned in three lists union list, concurrent list and state list. Any...

Q. Which one of the following is not related to the fundamental rights of the Indian Constitution?

Learn All Politics MCQs

Download our easy to use, user friendly Android App from Play Store. And learn MCQs with one click.