Q. Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent- is symbolized as
β
Correct Answer: (C)
P Ο½ q
Symbolic Logic MCQs and Notes
Q. Refutation by logical analogy is based on the fact that any argument whose specific form is an invalid argument form is ………………………..
β
Correct Answer: (C)
an invalid argument.
Q. If the specific form of a given argument has any substitution instance whose premises are true and whose conclusion is false, then the given argument is.
β
Correct Answer: (B)
invalid
Q. In case an argument is produced by substituting a different simple statement for each different statement variable in an argument form, that argument form is called ……………………
β
Correct Answer: (A)
the “specific form” of that argument
Q. Any argument that results from the substitution of statements for statement variables in an argument form is called ………………………………
β
Correct Answer: (D)
a “ substitution instance” of that argument form
Q. …………………………… can be defined as an array of symbols containing statement variables but no statements, such that when statements are substituted for statement variables- the same statement being substituted for the same statement variable throughout – the result is an argument
β
Correct Answer: (C)
An argument form
Q. An argument can be proved invalid by constructing another argument of the same form with …………………….
β
Correct Answer: (B)
true premises and false conclusion
Q. Ramesh and Dinesh will both not be elected.
β
Correct Answer: (B)
A . B
Q. ‘ A and B will not both be selected ’ is symbolized as ………………………..
β
Correct Answer: (A)
( A . B )
Q. The negaton of A V B is symbolized as ………………
β
Correct Answer: (B)
( A V B )